#TNTMIPS COMPACT RATIO FULL#
#TNTMIPS COMPACT RATIO ZIP#

#TNTMIPS COMPACT RATIO ZIP#

Please everybody, be aware that this Compact is a bit like the old Drivespace in DOS: it does NOT create a NEW file, like a zip file, but it stores the same file, or the whole directory, in a compressed manner. To un-compress all the files in the current directory and also in its sub directories: compact /u /s * To un-compress all the files in the current directory compact /u * To compress all the files in the current directory and also the sub directories and the files within them recursively compact /c /s *

To compress all the files in the current directory compact /c * Mydoc.txt 2779705 : 348160 = 8.0 to 1 ġ files within 1 directories were compressed.Ģ,779,705 total bytes of data are stored in 348,160 bytes.ġ files within 1 directories were uncompressed. So for this camera I prefer to set it at 3:2 for most of my shots and often switching to 16:9 for certain shots where a wider angle is preferable.New files added to this directory will not be compressed.Ġ are compressed and 1 are not compressed.Ģ,779,705 total bytes of data are stored in 2,779,705 bytes.Ĭompress a file from command line: compact /c filename The real benefit of this approach is that the viewing area actually gets wider at 3:2 and 16:9 with 16:9 being close to 22mm. It's unique in that each aspect ratio uses as much of the 12mp sensor as possible giving you sizes of 10mp for 4:3, 9.5mp for 3:2, 9mp for 16:9 and 7.5mp for 1:1. The one exception is my LX7 that uses a different method for its aspect ratios. This allows for the most presentation options. I prefer to shoot my cameras in their native aspect ratios and do any cropping later. That looks like a pretty handy feature and I'm glad you mentioned it. Is it the Video Rec Area setting? That presents a ghosted frame of 16:9 so that must be what you are talking about. It's meant to give you an indication what switching to video will do to the aspect ratio, but I find it helps me compose for HDTV viewing (for which I'd have to crop later) while allowing me to go taller when necessary without the need to change the sensor aspect ratio.

#TNTMIPS COMPACT RATIO FULL#

My FZ200 allows using the full 4:3 sensor while also displaying a 16:9 frame to aid in composing for the wider shot. So, there are several variables in making this decision! On a slightly different take, I've noticed that some people prefer 3:2 for landscapes, some 4:3.

The resulting pixels will be the same, whether cropping in camera or on the computer. In that case, I shoot at 3:2 just so that I can save time by not having to crop on the computer. On the other hand, I frequently stay at a Ranch in the California Sierras, where I photograph activities and make 4圆 prints. If I want to print 4圆, the bit of extra space will allow for cropping to that size.

I compose with a bit of extra space on the long side to take care of cropping. I like 4:3 because that is very close to my note card size (5.75' x 4.25'), resulting in 4000px x 2957px after a little cropping. It seems to me that what you want to do with the final image would determine the aspect ratio. What I was wondering on the Panasonic models is if it is better to shoot in 3:2, which I believe is the equivalent of the 35mm ratio?

Tntmips compact ratio